Thinking back to my
glory days of my freshman year of high school I can distinctly remember the
absurdly unhealthy school lunches that I ate every single day and the pleasure
that I took in doing so. I can still taste the uncooked chocolate chip cookies and Arizona
iced teas that I would end my meal with so frequently. Fast forward to my
senior year and the list of changes that have been made to school lunches seem
to be endless. Arizona iced tea was no longer sold, the cookies were burnt to a
crisp, and any “hot lunch” being served was whole wheat or reduced fat. I think
I can still hear the hushed whispers of everyone mumbling “thanks Michelle
Obama” after they threw away their half-eaten “healthy” lunch to get some
reduced fat dessert if I listen close enough.
When Barack Obama was elected to his second term
in office was when it seemed that the first lady really found her voice. The
Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 gave Michelle Obama the authority to
approve snack and lunches that are being served around the United States.
With this new found power, Obama was able to remove all snack food from
schools while limiting every child’s caloric intake to 750-850 during the
school day. While I can see where Obama is coming from with a genuine concern
for our nation’s rising rates of childhood obesity, I can only wonder if there
is a better way to go about bettering the population’s healthy while not
limiting schools on what can and can’t be sold to the student body. Not only
are the students unhappy with what is being served to them daily, but parents
are in an uproar, as well, because that is where their money is going. For some
people, this is a non-issue, but for others it seems like the end of the world.
Children and their parents are responsible for that they are consuming, so why
should the government have such a strong involvement? Perhaps schools can limit
the number of treats that are sold instead of eliminating them completely. In
addition, they should still sell the lunches that were once sold but limit the
portion sizes. There are ways to make a lunch healthy and appetizing at the
same time, but this is something that very clearly is not being accomplished. Maybe in the future there will be some sort of happy medium that
will please students and their parents while benefiting their general health
in the long run.
You barely seem to agree with your own argument here...
ReplyDeleteI see no harm in the government changing lunch policies. I think it is a step in the right direction. Kids can still bag their lunches and they can still go home and eat what they want. But the government CAN control what they serve in the cafeteria and it makes sense that they do so... because, like you said, obesity is an issue in this country.
More should be done, but not within the lunchroom. I am thinking towards physical activity.
Please provide supporting evidence for your statement that Michelle Obama, personally, had the authority to set school menu choices. Because without a URL from a reputable news source, your post comes across as something the Republican presidential candidates would say.
ReplyDeleteParents are in an uproar? Over whole wheat bread? These parents need a hobby...
ReplyDelete